<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quantum Optics and Quantum Information &#187; &#187; Bound entanglement &#171; Quantum Optics and Quantum Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://research.iqc.uwaterloo.ca/qoqi/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=bound-entanglement" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://research.iqc.uwaterloo.ca/qoqi</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 10:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bound entanglement comment in Nature Physics</title>
		<link>http://research.iqc.uwaterloo.ca/qoqi/?p=667</link>
		<comments>http://research.iqc.uwaterloo.ca/qoqi/?p=667#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qoqi]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bound entanglement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://info.iqc.ca/qoqi/?p=667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify">Our paper, Experimental Bound Entanglement?, by Jonathan Lavoie, Rainer Kaltenbaek, Marco Piani, and Kevin Resch was published in Nature Physics. This work comments on a claim of experimental bound entanglement published late last year in the same journal.</p> <p style="text-align: justify">Concluding paragraph of our comment: Undistillability is the one property that makes an [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify">Our paper, <a href="http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v6/n11/full/nphys1832.html">Experimental Bound Entanglement?</a>, by Jonathan Lavoie, Rainer Kaltenbaek, Marco Piani, and Kevin Resch was published in <a href="http://www.nature.com/nphys/index.html">Nature Physics</a>.  This work comments on a claim of experimental bound entanglement published late last year in the same journal.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Concluding paragraph of our comment: <em>Undistillability is the one property that makes an entangled state  bound. Amselem and Bourennane&#8217;s results fail to show undistillability  and thus they cannot claim to have produced bound entanglement.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">See here for the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v5/n10/full/nphys1372.html">original paper</a> and the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v6/n11/full/nphys1833.html">authors&#8217; reply</a> to our comment.  See also our recently published results <a href="http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v105/i13/e130501">[J. Lavoie et al. Physical Review Letters <strong>105</strong>, 130501 (2010)]</a> on experimental bound entanglement where, for the first time, we definitively show both properties of bound entanglement: entanglement and undistillability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://research.iqc.uwaterloo.ca/qoqi/?feed=rss2&#038;p=667</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
